Strategies and Calculations inside the Socialist Group

The Parliamentary “Fronde” through Schelling’s Prism

Authors

  • Damien Lecomte Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, CESSP, France.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14428/emulations.031.02

Keywords:

legislative studies, party discipline, socialist group, limited conflict, strategic calculations

Abstract

Legislative studies can analyze parliamentarians’ behavior through interactionist approaches: Schelling’s work can be usefully mobilized to understand actors’ coordination in the parliamentary arena and how they exchange political moves. The “fronde” within the Socialist Group during the 14th term (2012-2017) of the French National Assembly particularly lends itself to this type of approach. In a situation of relative crisis, of weakening of the reference points of party discipline and of uncertainty about the actions of their peers, deputies calculate the political costs of their potential dissent thanks to the positions of highly visible personalities who contribute to converging expectations. Conflict between government and a “rebellious” majority is a “limited conflict” between interdependent actors that can harm each other.

Author Biography

Damien Lecomte, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, CESSP, France.

Doctorant en science politique à l’Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne et membre du CESSP. Sa thèse porte sur le fait majoritaire et la discipline partisane à l’Assemblée nationale sous la Ve République française. Ses travaux se penchent sur l’organisation des groupes politiques à l’Assemblée nationale, l’indiscipline de vote et les relations de la majorité parlementaire avec le pouvoir exécutif. Sur la « fronde parlementaire », il a publié, avec Hugo Bouvard, Déborah Pérez et Julien Boelaert, « Le respect de la boutique » dans Politix (2017, n° 117).

Published

2019-11-15

How to Cite

Lecomte, D. (2019) “Strategies and Calculations inside the Socialist Group: The Parliamentary ‘Fronde’ through Schelling’s Prism”, Emulations - Revue de sciences sociales, (31), pp. 19–31. doi: 10.14428/emulations.031.02.