Odeurs et représentations de l’Autre pendant la Première Guerre mondiale

Authors

  • Juliette Courmont Agrégée et titulaire d'un master en histoire au Centre d'études historiques de l'EHESS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14428/emulations.012.002

Keywords:

First World War, Smell/scent, Culture of war, Enemy, Otherness/alterity

Abstract

During the Great War, the figure of German animality is used to great effect in French portrayals, because it brings into play most of the critiques of the enemy and serves to cut him off from humanity. In this symbolic act of violence, smell, the sense of contact, plays a particular role. During the invasion, scent is indirectly viewed as a Germanic effect, because troops intentionally leave excrement behind them in the houses they invade. This is a cruel practice of great violence through what is said to and of the other. However, victims’ interpretations are completely different from the message addressed to them through this act. Instead, they read here the absence of control of the adversary as a sign of his animality. Moreover, when directly confronted with the German, whether in invaded areas or at the front, the French spontaneously point out an intrinsic smell of the enemy. Through its personal dimension, olfactory feeling allows the bringing together of modes of perception with the experience of war. The indisputable nature of olfactory speech contributes to the violence of the culture of war and allows us to outline it further.

Author Biography

Juliette Courmont, Agrégée et titulaire d'un master en histoire au Centre d'études historiques de l'EHESS

Agrégée en histoire et enseigne en lycée. Ses travaux menés dans le cadre de l'EHESS ont reçu en 2008, une mention spéciale de la Société française d'histoire de la médecine, et elle a publié en 2010 un essai sur le sujet, L'Odeur de l'ennemi, préfacé par Alain Corbin.

Published

2014-12-23

How to Cite

Courmont, J. (2014) “Odeurs et représentations de l’Autre pendant la Première Guerre mondiale”, Emulations - Revue de sciences sociales, (12), pp. 23–33. doi: 10.14428/emulations.012.002.