Citizen science: epistemological challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20416/LSRSPS.V7I1.1Keywords:
participative science, citizen science, environmental sciences, big-data, epistemologyAbstract
Participation of non-professional scientists to scientific and technical development is an old practice, currently gaining a strong renewed interest under the form of « citizen science » or « participative science ». These participation practices have considerably diversified in the last decades, in fields such as environmental sciences, biomedicine, astronomy or fundamental biology. This growth of « citizen science » programs has generated a pluridisciplinary literature aiming at describing these practices in their sociological, political, ethical and epistemological dimensions. This state-of-the-art presents the main epistemological issues posed by citizen participation, in all its forms, to the constitution of scientific knowledge in the natural sciences It highlights both the opportunities and the challenges created by citizen science, as they are presented and studied in literature. One of the objective of this contribution is then to help constituting the issue of citizen participation as a fully-fledged research field for philosophy of science.
References
ADAM, Matthias. 2005. Integrating Research and Development: the Emergence of Rational Drug Design in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 513-537.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.07.003
ADAM, Matthias, CARRIER, Martin, WILHOLT, Torsten. 2006. How to Serve the Customer and Still Be Truthful: Methodological Characteristics of Applied Research. Science and Public Policy, 33(6), 435-444.
https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778849
ALBERTI, Samuel J. M. M. 2001. Amateurs and professionals in one county: Biology and natural history in late victorian yorkshire. Journal of the History of Biology, 34(1), 115-147.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010373912743
ARNSTEIN, Sherry R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
BALLARD, Heidi L., HUNTSINGER, Lynn. 2006. Salal Harvester Local Ecological Knowledge, Harvest Practices and Understory Management on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Human Ecology, 34(4), 526-547.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9048-7
BARNES, Barry. 2005. The credibility of scientific expertise in a culture of suspicion. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 30(1), 1118.
https://doi.org/10.1179/030801805X25882
BAUTISTA-PUIG, Nuria, DE FILIPPO, Daniela, MAULEÓN, Elba, SANZ-CASADO, Elias. 2019. Scientific Landscape of Citizen Science Publications: Dynamics, Content and Presence in Social Media. Publications, 7(12), 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010012
BEDESSEM, Baptiste. 2018. L’imprévisibilité de la science : un argument pour la liberté de
recherche ? La découverte des ARNi comme étude de cas. Lato Sensu, 5(1), 37-43.
https://doi.org/10.20416/lsrsps.v5i1.6
BIDDLE, Justin B. 2018. Antiscience zealotry? Values, epistemic risk, and the GMO debate. Philosophy of Science, 85(3), 360-379.
https://doi.org/10.1086/697749
BIDDLE, Justin B., KUKLA, Rebecca. 2017. The Geography of Epistemic Risk. In ELLIOTT, K. C., RICHARDS, T. (éds.). Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science. New York: Oxford University Press. 215-237.
BLONDIAUX, Luc. 2008. Le nouvel esprit de la démocratie. Actualité de la démocratie participative. Paris : Seuil.
BŒUF, Gilles, ALLAIN, Yves- Marie, BOUVIER, Michel. 2012. L'apport des sciences participatives dans la connaissance de la biodiversité. Rapport remis à la ministre de l’Écologie. https://journals.openedition.org/ocim/1119
https://doi.org/10.4000/ocim.1119
BONNEY, Rick, BALLARD, Heidi, JORDAN, Rebecca, McCALLIE, Ellen, PHILLIPS, Tina, SHIRK, Jennifer, WILDERMAN, Candie C. 2009a. Public Participation in Scientic Research. Washington, DC : Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
BONNEY, Rick, COOPER, Caren, DICKINSON, Janis L, KELLING, Steve, PHILLIPS, Tina, ROSENBERG, Kenneth, SHIRK, Jennifer L. 2009b. Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984.
https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
BONNEY, Rick, SHIRK, Jennifer, PHILLIPS, Tina, WIGGINS, Andrea, BALLARD, Heidi, MILLER-RUSHING, Abraham, PARRISH, Julia K. 2014. Next Steps for Citizen Science. Science, 343, 1436-1437.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554
BRANDON, Alice, SPYREAS, Greg, MOLANO-FLORES, Brenda, CUNNIGHAM, Connie, ELLIS, James. 2003. Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys? Nat Areas J, 23, 254–261.
BURGESS, Hillary, DE BEY, Lauren, FROEHLICH, Halley, SCHMIDT, Natalaie, THEOBALD, Elinore, ETTINGER, Ailene, HILLE RIS LAMBERS, Janneke, TEWKSBURY, Josh, PARRISH, Julia. 2017. The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208, 113-120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014
CASH, David, CLARK, William, ALCOCK, Frank, DICKSON, Nancy, SELIN, Noelle, GUSTON, David, JÄGER, Jïll. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 808691.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
CHANDLER, Mark, RULLMAN, Stan, COUSINS, Jenny, ESMAIL, Nafeesa, BEGIN, Elise, VENICX, Gitte, EISENBERG, Cristina, STUDER, Marie. Contributions to publications and management plans from 7 years of citizen science: Use of a novel evaluation tool on Earthwatch-supported projects. 2017. Biological Conservation, 28, 163-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.024
CHARVOLIN, Florian, MICOUD, André, NYHART, Lynn. 2007. Des sciences citoyennes ? La question de l'amateur dans les sciences naturalistes. La Tour d'Aigues : Éditions de l'Aube.
CHATZIGEORGIOU, Georgios, FAULWETTER, Sarah, DAILIANIS, Thanos, SMITH, Vincent, KOULOURI, Panayota, DOUNAS, Costas, ARVANITIDIS, Christos. 2016. Testing the robustness of Citizen Science projects: Evaluating the results of pilot project COMBER. Biodiversity Data Journal, 4, e10859.
https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10859
CHLOUS, Frédérique, DOZIRE, Anne, GUILLAUD, Dominique, LEGRAND, Marine. 2017. Foisonnement participatif : des questionnements communs ? Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25(4), 327-335.
https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018011
COMETS. 2015. Avis du COMETS. Les sciences citoyennes. Comité d'éthique du CNRS.
https://www.cnrs.fr/comets/IMG/pdf/comets-avis-sciences citoyennes-25 juin 2015.pdf
COMMISSION. 2013. Science for Environment Policy. Indepth-report: Environmental Citi
zen Science.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/IR9en.pdf
COMMISSION. 2014. Green paper on citizen science for Europe: Towards a society of
empowered citizens and enhanced research.
CONTAMIN, Jean-Gabriel, LEGRIS, Martin, SPRUYT, Émilie. 2017. La participation de la société civile dans la recherche en matière d'environnement : les citoyens face au double sens caché participatif. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25(4), 381-392.
https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018006
COOPER, Caren, LEWENSTEIN, Bruce. 2016. Two meanings of citizen science. In CAVELIER, D., KENNEDY, E. B. (éds.). The rightful place of science: Citizen Science. Tempe, AZ : Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes. 51-61.
COSQUER, Alix, RAYMOND, Richard, PRÉVOT-JULLIARD, Anne-Caroline. 2012. Observation of Everyday Biodiversity: a New Perspective for Conservation? Ecology and Society, 17(4), 2.
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04955-170402
COUVET, Denis, JIGUET, Frédéric, JULLIARD, Romain, LEVREL, Harold, TEYSSEDRE, Anne. 2008. Enhancing citizen contribution to biodiversity science and public policy. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33(1), 95-103.
https://doi.org/10.1179/030801808X260031
COUVET, Denis, PRÉVOT, Anne-Caroline. 2015. Citizen-science programs: Towards transformative biodiversity governance. Environmental Development, 13, 39-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.003
COX, Joe, OH, Ey, SIMMONS, Brooke, LINTOTT, Chris, MASTERS, Karen, GREENHILL, Anita, GRAHAM, Gary, HOLMES, Kate. 2015. Dening and measuring success in online citizen science: A case study of zooniverse projects. Computing in Science and Engineering, 17(4), 28-41.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2015.65
CRALL, Alycia, NEWMAN, Greg, JARNEVICH, Catherine, STOHLGREN, Thomas, WALLER, Donald, GRAHAM, Jim. 2010. Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biol Invasions, 12, 3419-3428.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9740-9
DANIELSEN, Finn et al. 2014. A multicountry assessment of tropical resource monitoring by local communities. BioScience 64, 236-51.
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu001
DELANEY, David, SPERLING, Corinne, ADAMS, Christiaan, LEUNG, Brian. 2008. Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biol Invasions, 10, 117-128.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0
DELFANTI, Alessandro. 2010. Genome Hackers, rebel biology, open source and science ethic. Thèse de doctorat. Università degli studi di Milano.
DEMERITT, David. 2015. The promises of participation in science and political ecology. In PERREAULT, Tom, BRIDGE, Gavin, MCCARTHY, James (éds.). The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Abingdon : Routledge. 224-234.
DEN BROEDER, Lea, DEVILEE, Jeroen, VAN OERS, Hans, SCHUIT, Albertine, WAGEMAKERS, Annemarie. 2018. Citizen science for public health. Health Promot. Int., 33(3), 505-514.
DEVICTOR, Vincent et al. 2012. Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nature Climate Change, 2(2), 121-124.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1347
DIAS DA SILVA, Patricia, HEATON, Lorna, MILLERAND, Florence. 2017. Une revue de littérature sur la "science citoyenne" : la production des connaissances naturalistes à l'ère numérique. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25(4), 370-380.
https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018004
DIBNER, Kenne, PANDYA, Rajul. 2018. Mapping the Landscape. In Learning Through Citizen Science: Enhancing Opportunities by Design. Washington : National Academies Press. 27-53.
DOUGLAS, Heather. 2009. Science, Policy and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh : University of
Pittsburgh Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78
EDEN, Sally, DONALDSON, Andrew, WALKER, Gordon. 2006. Green groups and grey areas : Scientific boundary-work, nongovernmental organisations, and environmental knowledge. Environmental and Planning A, 38, 106-176.
https://doi.org/10.1068/a37287
EIGENBRODE, Sanford, O'ROURKE, Michael, WULFHORST, J. D., ALTHOFF, David, GOLDBERG, Caren, MERRILL, Kaylani, MORSE, Wayde, NIELSEN-PINCUS, Max, STEPHENS, Jennifer, WINOWIECKI, Leigh, BOSQUE-PÉREZ, Nilsa. 2007. Employing philosophical dialogue in collaborative science. BioScience, 57(1), 55-64.
https://doi.org/10.1641/B570109
EITZEL, Melissa, CAPPADONNA, Jennifer, SANTOS-LANG, Chris, DUERR, Ruth, VIRAPONGSE, Arika, WEST, Sarah, et al. 2017. Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1.
https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96
ELLIOTT, Kevin. 2011. Is a Little Pollution Good for You ? Incorporating Societal Values in
Environmental Research. New York : Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755622.001.0001
ELLIOTT, Kevin, McCRIGHT, Aaron, SUMMER, Allen, DIETZ, Thomas. 2017. Values in environmental research: Citizens' views of scientists who acknowledge values. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0186049.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186049
ENGEL, Sarah, VOSHELL, J. Reese. 2002. Volunteer biological monitoring: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? American Entomologist, 48(3),164-177.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/48.3.164
ENGLISH, Paul, RICHARDSON, Maxwell, GARZON-GALVIS, Catalina. 2018. From crowdsourcing to extreme citizen science: participatory research for environmental health. Annual review of public health, 39, 335-350.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013702
FLICHY, P.atrice 2010. Le sacre de l'amateur. Sociologie des passions ordinaires l'ère numérique. Paris : Seuil.
FOLLETT, Ria, STREZOV, Vladimir. 2015. An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0143687.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687
FORE, Leska, PAULSEN, Kit, O'LAUGHLIN, Kate. 2001. Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biology, 46(1), 109-123.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2001.00640.x
FREITAG, Amy, MEYER, Ryan, WHITEMAN, Liz. 2016. Strategies Employed by Citizen Science Programs to Increase the Credibility of Their Data. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 2.
https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.6
GEORIS-CREUSEVEAU, Jade, NOUCHER, Matthieu, GOURMELON, Françoise. De la production de données d’observation à l’usage d’informations géographiques naturalistes, Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [En ligne], Science et Toile, document 878.
GIERE, Ronald. 2003. A new program for philosophy of science? Philosophy of Science, 70, 15-21.
https://doi.org/10.1086/367865
GODLEE, Fiona. 2016. At your next conference ask where the patients are. BMJ, 354, i5123.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5123
GOLUMBIC, Yaela., ORR, Daniela, BARAM-TSABARI, Ayelet, FISHBAIN, Barak. 2017. Between vision and reality: A study of scientists views on citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1.
https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.53
GRAND, Ann, WILKINSON, Clare, BULTITUDE, Karen, WINFIELD, Alan. 2016. Mapping the hinterland: Data issues in open science. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 88-103.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514530374
GURA, Trisha. 2013. Citizen science: amateur experts. Nature, 7444(496), 259-261.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7444-259a
HAKLAY, Muki. 2013. Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information overview and
typology of participation. In SUI, D.Z., ELWOOD, S., GOODCHILD M.F. (éds.) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. 105-122.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
HARDING, Sandra. 2015. Objectivity and Diversity: another Logic of Scientific Research. Chicago : Chicago University Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.001.0001
HAYWOOD, Benjamin. 2013. A sense of place in public participation in scientific research. Science Education, 98(1), 64-83.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21087
HEATON, Lorna, MILLERAND, Florence, LIU, Xiao, CRESPEL, Elodie. 2016. Participatory science: encouraging public engagement in ONEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(1), 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.942241
HECKER, Susanne et al. 2018. Innovation in Citizen Science – Perspectives on Science-Policy Advances. Citizen science: Theory and Practice, 3(1), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.114
HEISS, Raffael, MATTHES, Jörg. 2017. Citizen science in the social sciences: A call for more evidence, Gaia, 26(1), 22-26.
https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.7
HERMAN-MERCER, Nicole, ANTWEILER, Ronald, WILSON, Nicole, MUTTER, Edda, TOOHEY, Ryan, SCHUSTER, Paul. 2018. Data quality from a community-based, water-quality monitoring project in the yukon river basin. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 113.
https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.123
HOCHACHKA, Wesley, FINK, Daniel, HUTCHINSON, Rebecca, SHELDON, Daniel, WONG, Weng-Keen, KELLING, Steve. 2012. Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(2), 130-137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006
HOULLIER, François, MERILHOU-GOUDARD, Jean-Baptiste. 2016. Les sciences participatives en France : État des lieux, bonnes pratiques et recommandations. Rapport MESRI.
IRWIN, Alain. 1995. A Study of Citizen Expertise and Sustainable Development. London : Routledge.
JOLLYMORE, Ashlee, HAINES, Morgan, SATTERELD, Terre, JOHNSON, Mark. 2017. Citizen science for water quality monitoring: Data implications of citizen perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management, 200, 456-467.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.083
KAHANE, David, LOPSTON, Kristjana. 2013. Stakeholder and citizen roles in public deliberation. Journal of public deliberation, 9(2),1-37.
KELLY, Ashley, MADDALENA, Kate. 2015. Harnessing agency for efficacy: Foldit and citizen
science. Poroi, 11(1), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1184
KHATIB, Firas. et al. 2011. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, 18(10), 1175.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2119
KINCHY, Abby. 2016. Citizen science and democracy: Participatory water monitoring in the
marcellus shale fracking boom. Science as Culture, 26(1), 88-110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1223113
KING, Abby, et al. 2016. Leveraging citizen science and information technology for population physical activity promotion. Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 1, 3044.
KOSKINEN, Inkeri. 2018. Defending a risk account of scientic objectivity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy053
KOSMALA, Magaret, WIGGINS, Andrea, SWANSON, Alexandra, SIMMONS, Brooke. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10), 551-560.
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436
KOURANY, Janet. 2003. A philosophy of science for the twenty-first century. Philosophy of Science, 70(1), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1086/367864
KULLENBERG, Christopher, KASPEROWSKI, Dick. 2016. What is citizen science? A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0147152.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
LAND, Kate. et al. 2008. Galaxy Zoo: The large-scale spin statistics of spiral galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 388(4), 1686-1692.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13490.x
LANDRAIN, Thomas, MEYER, Morgan, PEREZ, Ariel, REMI, Sussan. 2013. Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement. Syst Synth Biol, 7, 115-126.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-013-9116-4
LAW, Edith, GAJOS, Krzysztof, WIGGINS, Andrea, GRAY, Mary, WILLIAMS, Alex. 2017. Crowdsourcing as a tool for research: Implications of uncertainty. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1544-1561.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998197
LE CROSNIER, Hervé, NEUBAUER, Claudia, STORUP, Bérangère. 2013. Sciences participatives ou ingénierie sociale : quand amateurs et chercheurs co-produisent les savoirs. Hermès, La Revue, 67, 68-74.
https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/51888
LEDFORD, Heidi. 2010. Life hackers. Nature, 467, 650-652.
https://doi.org/10.1038/467650a
LEWANDOWSKI, Eva, CALDWELL, Wendy, ELMQUIST, Dane, OBERHAUSER, Karen. 2017. Public perceptions of citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 19.
https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.77
LONGINO, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
LONGINO, Helen, LENNON, Kathleen. 1997. Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 71, 19-35.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00017
MANSNERUS, Erika, WAGENKNECHT, Susann. 2015. Feeling with the Organism: A Blueprint for an Empirical Philosophy of Science. In WAGENKNECHT, S., NERSESSIAN, N. J., ANDERSEN, H. (éds.). Empirical philosophy of science: Introducing qualitative methods into philosophy of science. Cham : Springer. 37-61.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_3
MEYER, Morgan. 2012. Build your own lab: Do-it-yourself biology and the rise of citizen biotecheconomies. Journal of Peer Production, 2, 1-4.
MIELKE, Jahel, VERMABENC, Hannah, ELLENBECK, Saskia. 2017. Ideals, practices, and future prospects of stakeholder involvement in sustainability science. PNAS, E10648E10657.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706085114
MILLER-RUSHING, Abraham, PRIMACK, Richard, BONNEY, Rick. 2012. The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 20(6), 285-290.
https://doi.org/10.1890/110278
MORRISON, Margaret. 2011. Between the Pure and Applied: The Search for the Elusive Middle Ground. In CARRIER M., NORDMANN, A. (éds.). Science in the Context of Application. Boston : Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 274. 31-45.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_3
MORRISSETTE, Joëlle. 2019. Recherche-action et recherche collaborative. Quel rapport aux savoirs et à la production de savoirs ? Nouvelles pratiques sociales, 25(2), 35-49.
https://doi.org/10.7202/1020820ar
NASCIMENTO, Susana, GUIMARAES PEREIRA, Angela, GHEZZI, Alessia. 2014. From citizen science to do it yourself science. An annotated account of an on-going movement. Luxembourg : Publications of the European Union.
NATURE. 2015. Editorial: Rise of the citizen scientist. Nature, 524, 265.
https://doi.org/10.1038/524265a
NERSESSIAN, Nancy. 2005. Interpreting scientic and engineering practices: integrating the
cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions. In GORMAN, M.E., TWENEY, R.D., GOODING, D.C., KINCANNON, A. P. (éds.). Scientific and Technological Thinking. Mahwah : L. Erlbaum. 17-56.
OSBECK, Lisa, NERSESSIAN, Nancy. 2015. Prolegomena to an Empirical Philosophy of Science.
In WAGENKNECHT, S., NERSESSIAN, N. J., ANDERSEN, H. (éds.). Empirical philosophy of science: Introducing qualitative methods into philosophy of science. Cham : Springer. 13-36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_2
OTTINGER, Gwen. 2010. Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(2), 244-270.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909337121
OWEN, Richard, MACNAGHTEN, Phil, STILGOE, Jack. 2013. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093
PALACIN-SILVA, Victoria, SEFFAH, Ahmed, HEIKKINEN, Karl, PORRAS, Jari, PYHALAHTI, Timo, SUCKSDOR, Yrjö, ANTTILA, Saku, ALASALMI, Hanna, BRUUN, Eeva, JUNTTILA, Sofia. 2016. State-of-the Art Study in Citizen Observatories: Technological Trends, Development Challenges and Research Avenues. Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute, 28.
PARKINS, John, MITCHELL, Ross. 2005. Public participation as public debate: A deliberative
turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 52940.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590947977
PARRISH, Julia, BURGESS, Hillary, WELTZIN, Jake, FORTSON, Lucy, WIGGINS, Andrea, SIMMONS, Brooke. 2018. Exposing the Science in Citizen Science: Fitness to Purpose and Intentional Design. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58(1), 150-160.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy032
PRÉVOT, Anne-Caroline, DOZIÈRES, Anne, TURPIN, Sébastien, JULLIARD, Romain. 2016. Les réseaux volontaires d'observateurs de la biodiversité (vigie-nature) : quelles opportunités d'apprentissage ? Cahiers de l'action, 47, 35-40.
https://doi.org/10.3917/cact.047.0035
PRÉVOT, Anne-Caroline, CHEVAL, Hélène, RAYMOND, Richard, COSQUER, Alix. 2018. Routine Experiences of Nature in Cities Can Increase Personal Commitment Toward Bidiversity of Conservation. Biological Conservation, 226,1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.008
PRYSBY, Michelle, OBERHAUSER, Karen. 2004. Temporal and geographic variation in monarch densities: citizen scientists document monarch population patterns. In OBERHAUSER, Karen S., SOLENSKY, M.J. (éds). Monarch Butterfly Biology & Conservation. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
RADDER, Hans. 2010. The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zw87p
RESNIK, David. 2010. Financial Interests and the Norms of Academic Science. In RADDER H. (éd.). The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press. 65-89.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zw87p.7
RESNIK, David, ELLIOTT, Kevin, MILLER-RUSHING, Abraham. 2015. A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science. Environmental Science and Policy, 54, 47581.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.008
RIESCH, Hauke, POTTER, Clive. 2014. Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological,
epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science., 23(1), 107-120.
RIP, Arie. 2016. The clothes of the emperor. An essay on RRI in and around Brussels. Journal of responsible innovation, 3(3), 290-304.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1255701
ROLIN, Kristina. 2016. Values, standpoints, and scientific/intellectual movements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 56, 11-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.008
ROY, Helen, POCOCK, Michael, PRESTON, Chris, ROY, David, SAVAGE, Joanna, TWEDDLE, John. 2012. Understanding Citizen Science & Environmental Monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF.
RUDNER, Richard. 1953. The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20(1), 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1086/287231
SAREWITZ, Daniel. 2000. Science and Environmental Policy: An Excess of Objectivity. In FRODEMAN, Robert (éd.). Earth Matters : The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community. Upper Saddle River : Prentice Hall.
SAREWITZ, Daniel. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental
Science and Policy, 7(5), 385403.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
SCHELIGA, Kaja, FRIESIKE, Sascha, PUSCHMANN, Cornelius, FECHER, Benedikt. 2018. Setting up crowd science projects. Public Understanding of Science, 27(5), 515-534.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516678514
SCHRÖGEL, Philipp, KOLLECK, Alma. 2018. The Many Faces of Participation in Science: litterature Review and Proposal for a Three-Dimensional Framework. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 77-99.
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.59519
STEEL, Daniel, FAZELPOUR, Sina, CREWE, Bianca, GILLETTE, Kinley. 2019. Information elaboration and epistemic effects of diversity, Synthese.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02108-w
STOKES, Donald. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington : Brookinks Institution Press.
STRASSER, Bruno, BAUDRY, Jérôme, MAHR, Dana, SANCHEZ, Gabriela, TANCOIGNE, Elise. “Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation. 2019. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 52-76.
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60425
SVENDSEN, Bente. 2018. The dynamics of citizen sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 22(2), 137-160.
https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12276
SVETLOVA, Ekaterina. 2015. The Benets and Challenges of Qualitative Methods. In WAGENKNECHT, S., NERSESSIAN, N. J., ANDERSEN, H. (éds.). Empirical philosophy of science: Introducing qualitative methods into philosophy of science. Cham : Springer. 37-61.
TESH, Sylvia. 1999. Citizen experts in environmental risk. Policy Sciences, 32, 3958.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004398228075
THOREN, Enrik. 2015. History and Philosophy of Science as an Interdisciplinary Field of Problem
Transfers. In WAGENKNECHT, S., NERSESSIAN, N. J., ANDERSEN, H. (éds.). Empirical philosophy of science: Introducing qualitative methods into philosophy of science. Cham : Springer. 127-143.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_8
TULLOCH, Ayesha, POSSINGHAM, Hugh, JOSEPH, Liana, SZABO, Judith, MARTIN, Tara. 2013. Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation, 165, 128-138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025
VAN DER VEGT, Rens. 2018. A literature review on the relationship between risk governance and public engagement in relation to complex environmental issues. Journal of Risk Research, 21(11), 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351466
WAGENKNECHT, Susann, NERSESSIAN, Nancy, ANDERSEN, Hanne. 2015. Empirical philosophy of science: Introducing qualitative methods into philosophy of science. Cham : Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_1
WATSON, David, FLORIDI, Luciano. 2016. Crowdsourced science: sociotechnical epistemology
in the e-research paradigm. Synthese, 195(2), 741-764.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2914230
WIGGINS, Andrea, CROWNSTON, Kevin. 2011. From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. Hawaii : International Conference on System Sciences.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
WIGGINS, Andrea, BONNEY, Rick, LEBUHN, Gretchen, PARRISH, Julia, WELTZIN, Jake. 2018. A Science Products Inventory for Citizen-Science Planning and Evaluation. BioScience, 68(6), 436-444.
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy028
WILDERMAN, Candie. 2007. Models of Community Science: Design Lessons from the Field. Citizen Science Toolkit Conference, Ithaca.
WILLOW, Anna, WYLIE, Sara. 2014. Politics, ecology, and the new anthropology of energy: exploring the emerging frontiers of hydraulic fracking. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 222-236.
https://doi.org/10.2458/v21i1.21134
WYLIE, Alison. 2006. When Difference Makes A Difference: Epistemic Diversity and Dissent. Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology, 3(1), 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1353/epi.0.0009
WYNNE, Brian. 1996. May the Sheep Graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide.
In LASH, S., SZERSZYNSKI, B., WYNNE, B. (éds.). Risk, Environment and Modernity, p.44-84. London : Sages Publication.
YAMAMOTO, Yuri. 2012. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious
natural resource debate. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 101-125.
YU, Jun, KELLING, Steve, GERBRACHT, Jeff, WONG, Weng-Keen. 2011. Emergent filters: automated data verification in a large-scale citizen science project. In IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science, 5th-8th December. Stockholm : Workshop Proceedings. 20-27.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Baptiste Bedessem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
