ontologie dispositionnelle du risque

Authors

  • Olivier Grenier Université de Sherbrooke
  • Adrien Barton

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20416/LSRSPS.V8I2.6

Keywords:

risk, applied ontology, disposition, causality, preferences

Abstract

Risk is an ubiquitous entity in the biomedical domain. Thus, a coherent ontological characterization of risk, which can be used by informatical tools named "applied ontologies", is necessary to help with the exchange and the collection of data for clinical and research uses. We analyze some definitions of risk and draw two general characteristics that risks and dispositions share. We thus suggest that a risk is a disposition which has an undesirable realization for an agent. This definition conciliates the objective dimension and the subjective dimension of risk : a risk exist independantly of our knowledge about it, but the status of risk of a given disposition for an agent depends of the preferences of this agent.

References

ARP, Robert, SMITH, Barry, SPEAR, Andrew. 2015. Building Ontologies With Basic Formal Ontology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.001.0001

BARTON, Adrien et al. 2017. What is a risk? A formal representation of risk of stroke for people with atrial fibrillation. In HORRIDGE, Matthew, LORD, Phillip, WARRENDER, Jennifer D. (éds.). Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2017). Newcastle: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1-6.

BARTON, Adrien et al. 2018. The identity of dispositions. In BORGO, Stefano, HITZLER, Pascal, KUTZ, Oliver (éds.). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. 306, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 113-126.

BARTON, Adrien, BURGUN, Anita, DUVAUFERRIER, Régis. 2012. Probability assignments to dispositions in ontologies. In DONNELLY, Maureen, GUIZZARDI, Giancarlo (éds.). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2012), Amsterdam: IOS Press, 3-14.

BARTON, Adrien, GRENIER, Olivier, ÉTHIER, Jean-François. 2018. The identity and mereology of pathological dispositions. In JAISWAL, Pankaj, COOPER, Laurel, HAENDEL, Melissa A., MUNGALL, Christopher J. (éds.). Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Biological Ontology (ICBO 2018), Corvallis: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1-6.

BARTON, Adrien, JANSEN, Ludger, ÉTHIER, Jean-François. 2017. A taxonomy of disposition-parthood. In BORGO, Stefano, KUTZ, Oliver, LOEBE, Frank, NEUHAS, Fabian (éds.). Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops 2017 (JOWO 2017). Bolzano: CEUR Worshop Proceedings, 1-10.

BARTON, Adrien, ROSIER, Arnaud. 2016. Ontologies appliquées biomédicales et ontologie philosophique : un développement complémentaire. Lato Sensu, revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences, 3(1), 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.20416/lsrsps.v3i1.273

BIRD, Alexander, TOBIN, Emma. 2018. Natural Kinds. In ZALTA, Edward N. (éd.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Édition du printemps 2018, URL = < https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/‌spr2018/entries/natural-kinds/ >.

BOHOLM, Asa, CORVELLEC, Hervé. 2010. A Relational Theory of Risk. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 175-190.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.515313

CHAKRAVARTTY, Anjan. 2017a. Saving the Scientific Phenomena: What Powers Can and Cannot Do. In JACOBS, Jonathan D. (éd.). Causal Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 24-37.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796572.003.0003

CHAKRAVARTTY, Anjan. 2017b. Scientific Realism. In ZALTA, Edward N. (éd.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Édition de l’été 2017, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/‌sum2017‌/entries/scientific-realism/ >.

CHOI, Sungho, FARA, Michael. 2018. Dispositions. In ZALTA, Edward N. (éd.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Édition de l’automne 2018, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/‌fall2018/entries/dispositions/ >.

DOUGLAS, Mary, WILDAVSKY, Aaron. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Californie: University of California Press.

https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520907393

ESFELD, Michael. 2011. Causal Realism. In DIEKS, Dennis et al. (éds.). Probabilities, Laws, and Structures. Dordrecht: Springer, 157-168.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3030-4_11

ÉTHIER, Jean-François et al. 2018. The TRANSFoRm project: Experience and lessons learned regarding functional and interoperability requirements to support primary care. Learning Health System, 2(2), 1-7.

https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10037

FISCHHOFF, Baruch, KADVANY, John. 2011. Risk: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199576203.001.0001

FRIEDMAN, Charles P. et al. 2017. The Science of Learning Health Systems: Foundations for a New Journal. Learning Health Systems, 1(1), 1-3.

https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10020

GRANDI, Fabio et al. 2019. Towards Patient-Centric Healthcare: Multi-Version Ontology-Based Personalization of Clinical Guidelines. In LYTRAS, Miltiadis D. et al. (éds.). Semantic Web Science and Real-World Application. Hershey: IGI Global, 273-301.

https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7186-5.ch011

GUZZINI, Stefano. 2017. Power and Cause. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20, 737-759.

HANSSON, Sven Ove. 2018. « Risk ». In ZALTA, Edward N. (éd.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Édition de l’automne 2018. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/‌fall2018/entries/risk/>.

HARRIS, Steve, SEABORNE, Andy. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 Query Language: W3C Recommandation. URL = <https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/>.

HE, Yongqun et al. (2014). OAE : The Ontology of Adverse Events. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5(29), 1-13.

https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-29

HILGARTNER, Stephen. 1992. The Social Construction of Risk Objects: or, How to Pry Open Networks of Risk. In SHORT, James F., LEE, Clarke (éds.). Organizations, Uncertainties, and Risk. Boulder: Westview Press, 39-53.

JANSEN, Ludger. 2007. Tendencies and other Realizables in Medical Information Sciences. The Monist, 90(4), 534-554.

https://doi.org/10.5840/monist200790436

KERMISCH, Céline. 2012. Vers une définition multidimensionnelle du risque. [Vertigo] La revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement, 12(2), 2-15.

https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12214

LEWIS, David. 1966. An Argument for the Identity Theory. Journal of Philosophy, 63, 17-25.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2024524

LUPTON, Deborah. 2013. Risk : Second Edition. New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070161

MACKIE, John L. 1965. Causes and Conditions. American Philosophical Quaterly, 2(4), 245-264.

McKITRICK, Jennifer. 2010. Manifestation as Effects. In MARMODORO, Anna (éd.). The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and their Manifestation. New York: Routledge, 73-83.

MUNN, Katherine. 2008. Introduction: What is Ontology For? In MUNN, Katherine, SMITH, Barry (éds.). Applied Ontology: An Introduction. Heusentstamm: Ontos Verlage, 7-19.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110324860.7

OBITKO, Marek. 2007. Introduction to Ontologies and Semantic Web. URL = <https://www.obitko.com‌‌/‌tutorials/‌ontologies-semantic-web/>.

ORILIA, Francesco, PAOLETTI, Michele Paolini. 2020. Properties. In ZALTA, Edward N. (éd.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Édition de l’hiver 2020, URL = < https://plato.stanford.edu/‌archives‌/win2017/entries/properties/ >.

PEACOCKE, Christopher. 1978. Holistic Explanations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

POPPER, Karl R. 1959. The Propensity Interpretation of Probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10(37), 25-42.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/x.37.25

POPPER, Karl R. 1990. A World of Propensities. Bristol: Thoemmes Antiquarian Books.

PRIOR, Elizabeth W., PARGETTER, Robert, JACKSON, Frank. 1982. Three Theses about Dispositions. American Philosophical Quaterly, 19(3), 251-257.

QUINE, Willard V. O. 1974. Roots of Reference. La Salle: Open Court.

RAYNER, Steve, CANTOR, Robin. 1987. How Fair is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Social Technology Choice. Risk Analysis, 7(1), 3-9.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00963.x

RIAÑO, David et al. 2012. An ontology-based personalization of healthcare knowledge to support clinical decisions for chronically ill patients. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(3), 429-446.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.12.008

ROSA, Eugene A. 2010. The logical status of risk – to burnish or to dull. Journal of Risk Research, 13(3), 239-253.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903484351

SALES, Tiago Prince et al. 2018. The Common Ontology of Value and Risk. In TRUJILLO, J. et al. (éds.). Conceptual Modeling. ER 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, 121-135.

SCHEUERMANN, Richard H. et al. 2009. Toward an Ontological Treatment of Disease and Diagnosis. Summit on Translational Bioinformatics, 116-120.

SCHULTZ, Stefan et al. 2009. Strength and limitations of formal ontologies in the biomedical domain. Rev Electron Comun Inf Inov Saude, 3(1), 31-45.

https://doi.org/10.3395/reciis.v3i1.241en

SHOEMAKER, Sydney. 1980. Causality and Properties. In VAN INWAGEN, Peter (éd.). Time and Cause. Dordrecht: Reidel, 109-135.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3528-5_7

SIEGELE, Deborah A. et al. 2019. Phenotype annotation with the ontology of microbial phenotype (OMP). Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 10(13), 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-019-0205-5

SMITH, Barry et al. 2007. The OBO Foundry: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies to Support Biomedical Data Integration. Nature Biotechnology, 25, 1251-1255.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1346

SMITH, Barry, CEUSTERS, Werner. 2010. Ontological Realism: A Methodology for Coordinated Evolution of Scientific Ontologies. Applied Ontology, 5(3-4), 139-188.

https://doi.org/10.3233/ao-2010-0079

STARR, Chauncey et al. 1976. Philosophical Basis for Risk Analysis. Annual Review of Energy. 1, 629-662.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.01.110176.003213

TANSEY, James, RAYNER, Steve. 2009. Cultural Theory and Risk. In HEATH, Robert L., O՚HAIR, H. Dan (éds.). Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. New York: Taylor & Francis, 53-79.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070726-4

THOMPSON, Paul B. 1986. The Philosophical Foundations of Risk. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 24(2), 273-286.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1986.tb01566.x

UCITELI, Alexandr et al. 2016. Risk Identification Ontology (RIO): An ontology for specification and identification of perioperative risks. In LOEBE, Frank et al. (éds.). Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Ontologies and Data in Life Sciences (ODLS 2016). Halle (Saale): CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1-7.

VAN HARMELEN, Frank. 2005. Ontology Mapping: A Way Out of the Medical Tower of Babel? In MIKSCH, Silvia, HUNTER, Jim, KERAVNOU, Elpida (éds.). Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medecine (AIME 2005), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 3-6.

WOLFF, Jonathan. 2006. Risk, Fear, Blame, Shame and the Regulation of Public Safety. Economics and Philosophy, 22, 409-427.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266267106001040

Downloads

Published

2021-04-06

How to Cite

Grenier, Olivier, and Adrien Barton. 2021. “Ontologie Dispositionnelle Du Risque”. Lato Sensu: Revue De La Société De Philosophie Des Sciences 8 (2):58-69. https://doi.org/10.20416/LSRSPS.V8I2.6.

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021): Théorie et données à l'heure des données massives. Proceedings of the 7th congress of the Société de philosophie des sciences

Section

Proceedings of the 2018 congress

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Olivier Grenier

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.