Introduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20416/LSRSPS.V11I1.1Abstract
L’objectif de ce numéro spécial est d’ouvrir la réflexion sur la notion de vague à partir du prisme de la philosophie des sciences, afin d’interroger le sens de cette notion dans différents domaines de la recherche scientifique.
References
Bibliographie
Alston, W., (1964), Philosophy of Language, Englewoods Cliffs NJ, Prentice Hall Inc.
Bachelard, G., (1947), La formation de l’esprit scientifique, Paris, Vrin.
Borsboom, D., Cramer A., Kalis A., (2019), « Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research ». Behavioral and Brain Sciences; 42:e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17002266.
Burks, E., (1946), « Empiricism and Vagueness? ». The Journal of Philosophy, 43(18), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2018954.
Burns, L., (2012), Vagueness: An investigation into natural languages and the sorites paradox (Vol. 4), Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108511.
Dietz, R., Moruzzi, S. (Eds.), (2010), Cuts and clouds: Vagueness, its nature and its logic. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-013-9212-x. Alston, W., (1964), Philosophy of Language, Englewoods Cliffs NJ, Prentice Hall Inc.
Egré, P., (2018), « Qu’est-ce que le vague », Vrin, 2018.
Haslam, N., (2000), « Psychiatric categories as natural kinds: Essentialist thinking about mental disorder ». Social Research, 1031-1058. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971424.
Hofmann, B., (2022), « Vagueness in medicine: on disciplinary indistinctness, fuzzy phenomena, vague concepts, uncertain knowledge, and fact-value-interaction ». Axiomathes, 32(6), 1151-1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09573-4.
Hu, I., (2017), « ‘Vague’ at higher orders », Mind, 126(504), 1189-1216. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw046.
Hyde, D., (1994), « Why Higher-Order Vagueness Is a Pseudo-Problem », Mind, 103(409): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/103.409.35.
Keefe, R., (2000), Theories of vagueness, Cambridge University Press.
Keil, G., Keuck, L., et Hauswald, R., (Eds.), (2017), Vagueness in psychiatry, Oxford University Press.
Neto, C., (2020), « When imprecision is a good thing, or how imprecise concepts facilitate integration in biology », Biology & Philosophy, 35(6), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-09774-y.
Russell, B., (1923), « Vagueness ». Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, 1(2), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402308540623.
Seising R., (2008), « On the absence of strict boundaries—Vagueness, haziness, and fuzziness in philosophy, science, and medicine », Applied soft computing, 8(3), 1232-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2007.02.017.
Shapiro, S., et Snyder, E., (2016), « Vagueness and Context », Inquiry, 59(4), 343-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2015.1083472.
Sorensen, R., (1985), « An Argument for the Vagueness of “Vague” », Analysis 45:134–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/45.3.134.
Id., (2001), Vagueness and Contradiction, Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00480.x.
Id., (2018), « Vagueness », The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. N. Zalta (Ed.).
Toepfer G., (2019), « On the Impossibility and Dispensability of Defining “Biodiversity” », in From assessing to conserving biodiversity, Springer, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10991-2_16.
Van Deemter, K., (2012). Not exactly: In praise of vagueness. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9251-1.
Williamson, T., (2002). Vagueness, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014264.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marco Casali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
