Existe-t-il un paradigme darwinien ? Pour une ontologie historique de la théorie de l’évolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20416/lsrsps.v5i1.8Keywords:
historical ontology, history and philosophy of biology, evolutionary theory, Thomas Kuhn, paradigmAbstract
Darwin’s theory is regarded by many historians as a true scientific revolution That is why the aim of this paper is precisely to account for its revolutionary features, in the framework of an understanding of scientific revolutions that draws on Thomas Kuhn’s works. This implies defining a “Darwinian paradigm”, both as a disciplinary matrix and as an exemplary solution to a given problem. Therefore, we will define the structure and content of Darwin’s theory, in order to highlight the question that could form the basis of a “Darwinian paradigm”, i.e. the problem of the adaptive complexity of life. We will thus identify what could set that paradigm apart from all others, so that the problem of complexity could only be raised and solved within its framework. To do so, we will focus on two dichotomies, i.e. the one between functionalism and formalism, as well as the one between naturalism and idealism. In conclusion, we will point out the limits of Kuhn’s epistemology for the analysis of evolutionary theory, which will lead us to sketch the outline of an alternative approach that we call “historical ontology”.
References
BOWLER, Peter J. 2003. Evolution. The History of an Idea. 3ème éd. Los Angeles : University of California Press.
CUVIER, Georges. 1817. Le Règne animal distribué d’après son organisation. Tome I. Paris : Déterville.
DARWIN, Charles, WALLACE, Arthur Russell. 1858. On the tendency of species to form varieties. Zoologist, 16, 6293-6297.
DARWIN, Charles, BECQUEMONT, Daniel (trad.). 1992. Ébauche de l’origine des espèces (Essai de 1844). Lille : Presses universitaires de Lille.
FOUCAULT, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris : Gallimard.
GARDNER, Andy. 2009. Adaptation as organismal design. Biology Letters, 5(6), 861-864.
GAYON, Jean. 1992. Darwin et l’après-Darwin. Paris : Kimé.
GAYON, Jean. 2009. Cuvier, Georges (1769-1832). In RUSE, Michael, TRAVIS, Joseph (dir.). Evolution. The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA : Belknap Press. 499-503.
GOULD, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
HIMMELFARB, Gertrude. 1959. Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution. Londres : Chatto and Windus.
JARDINE, Nicholas. 2000. The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences. 2nde éd. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
KUHN, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3ème éd. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
LOVEJOY, Arthur O. 1909. The argument for organic evolution before The Origin of Species. The Popular Science Monthly, 75, 499-514, 537-549.
MAYR, Ernst. 1975. Evolution and the Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
MAYR, Ernst. 1992. Darwin’s principle of divergence. Journal of the History of Biology, 25(3), 343-359.
McSHEA, Daniel W., BRANDON, Robert N. 2010. Biology’s First Law. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
OWEN, Richard. 1848. On the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton. Londres : Richard and John E. Taylor.
PROVINE, William B. 2001. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. 2nde éd. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
RAZETO-BARRY, Pablo. 2013. Complexity, adaptive complexity and the Creative View of natural selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(3), 312-315.
RICHARDS, Robert J. 1992. The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
RICHARDS, Robert J. 2008. The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle Over Evolutionary Thought. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
RICHARDS, Robert J. 2012. Darwin’s principles of divergence and natural selection: Why Fodor was almost right. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(1), 256-268.
RUPKE, Nicolaas. 2009. Richard Owen. Biology without Darwin. 2nde éd. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
RUSE, Michael. 1977. William Whewell and the argument from design. The Monist, 60(2), 244-268.
RUSE, Michael. 1989. The Darwinian Paradigm. Londres : Routledge.
RUSE, Michael. 1999. The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. 2nde éd. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
RUSE, Michael. 2003. Darwin and Design. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
RUSE, Michael. 2005. The Darwinian revolution, as seen in 1979 and as seen twenty-five years later in 2004. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 3-17.
RUSE, Michael. 2009a. The Darwinian revolution: Rethinking its meaning and significance. PNAS, 106(1), 10040-10047.
RUSE, Michael. 2009b. The History of Evolutionary Thought. In RUSE, Michael, TRAVIS, Joseph (dir.). Evolution. The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA : Belknap Press. 1-48.
RUSE, Michael. 2009c. Whewell, William (1794-1866). In RUSE, Michael, TRAVIS, Joseph (dir.). Evolution. The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, MA : Belknap Press. 913-919.
RUSSELL, Edward S. 1916. Form and Function. Londres: John Murray.
SCHWEBER, Silvan S. 1980. Darwin and the political economists. Journal of the History of Biology, 13, 195-289.
SCHWEBER, Silvan S. 1983. Facteurs idéologiques et intellectuels dans la genèse de la théorie de la sélection naturelle. In CONRY, Yvette (dir.). De Darwin au darwinisme : Science et idéologie. Paris: Vrin. 123-142.
SLOAN, Phillip R. 2003. The Making of a Philosophical Naturalist. In HODGE, Jonathan, RADICK, Gregory (dir.). The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 17-39.
SMOCOVITIS, V. Betty. 1992. Unifying biology: the evolutionary synthesis and evolutionary biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 25 (1), 1-65.
WINTHER, Rasmus G. 2000. Darwin on variation and heredity. Journal of the History of Biology, 33(3), 425-455.
YOUNG, Robert M. 1985. Darwin’s Metaphor: Nature’s Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Nicola Bertoldi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
