A metaphysical metametaphysical skepticism?

Essay review of Scientific Ontology. Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology, by Anjan Chakravartty, Oxford University Press, 2017

Auteurs

  • Raphaël Künstler Université de Toulouse-Jean Jaurès

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.20416/10.20416/LSRSPS.V8I1.2

Références

BAGHRAMIAN, Maria. 2019. The Virtues of Relativism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93(1): 247-270.

https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akz013

BOUCHER, Sandy. 2014. What is a philosophical stance? Paradigms, policies and perspectives? Synthese 191(10): 2315-2332.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0400-y

BRYANT, Amanda. Forthcoming. A thousand flowers on the road to epistemic anarchy. Comments on Chakravartty’s Scientific Ontology. Dialogue.

CHAKRAVARTTY, Anjan. 2017. Scientific Ontology. Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190651459.001.0001

CHAKRAVARTTY, Anjan. 2018. Feeling in Guts and Bones. Reply to Lewis, Magnus and Strevens. Metascience 27(3) : 371-378.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-018-0341-z

DUHEM, Pierre. 1906. La théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure. Paris. Chevalier & Rivière Éditeurs.

ESFELD, Michael. 2009. The Modal Nature of Structures in Ontic Structural Realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23(2): 179-194.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903006917

FRENCH, Steven, 2014. The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684847.001.0001

HEIL, John. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/0199259747.001.0001

HUMPHREYS, Paul. 2013. Scientific Ontology and Speculative Ontology. In D. Ross, J. Ladyman, H. Kincaid (eds), Scientific Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 51-78

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696499.003.0003

JAMES, William. 1896. The will to Believe. The New World, 5: 327-347.

KUHN, Samuel. 1977. Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice. In The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 320-339.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001

KUSCH, Martin. 2019. Relativist Stances. Virtues and Vices. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93(1): 271-291.

https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akz007

QUINE, Willard. 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, p. 20-46

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c5cx5c.7

LADYMAN, James & ROSS, Don. 2007. Every Thing Must Go. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001

LEWIS, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LEWIS, Peter J. 2018. Inferring Particles. Metascience 27(3) : 357-364

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-018-0340-0

LIPTON, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470855

MAURIN, Anna-Sophia & BRINKS, Ingar. 2005. Revisionary Metaphysics. An interview with David Armstrong. Theoria 71(1): 3-19.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2005.tb01001.x

PAUL, Laurie. 2012. Metaphysics as Modelling: The Handmaiden’s Tale. Philosophical Studies 160(1): 1-29.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9906-7

STREVENS, Michael. 2018. Explanation and Reality. Comments on Chakravartty. Metascience, 27(3): 371-378.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-018-0343-x

TELLER, Paul. 2018. Discussion. What is a Stance. Philosophical Studies 121(2): 159-170.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5489-2

VAN FRAASSEN, Bas C. 2002. The Empirical Stance. Yale: Yale University Press.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2021-03-24

Comment citer

Künstler, Raphaël. 2021. « A Metaphysical Metametaphysical Skepticism? Essay Review of Scientific Ontology. Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology, by Anjan Chakravartty, Oxford University Press, 2017 ». Lato Sensu: Revue De La Société De Philosophie Des Sciences 8 (1):12-20. https://doi.org/10.20416/10.20416/LSRSPS.V8I1.2.

Numéro

Rubrique

Compte rendu critique