A metaphysical metametaphysical skepticism?
Essay review of Scientific Ontology. Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology, by Anjan Chakravartty, Oxford University Press, 2017
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.20416/10.20416/LSRSPS.V8I1.2Références
BAGHRAMIAN, Maria. 2019. The Virtues of Relativism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93(1): 247-270.
https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akz013
BOUCHER, Sandy. 2014. What is a philosophical stance? Paradigms, policies and perspectives? Synthese 191(10): 2315-2332.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0400-y
BRYANT, Amanda. Forthcoming. A thousand flowers on the road to epistemic anarchy. Comments on Chakravartty’s Scientific Ontology. Dialogue.
CHAKRAVARTTY, Anjan. 2017. Scientific Ontology. Integrating naturalized metaphysics and voluntarist epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190651459.001.0001
CHAKRAVARTTY, Anjan. 2018. Feeling in Guts and Bones. Reply to Lewis, Magnus and Strevens. Metascience 27(3) : 371-378.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-018-0341-z
DUHEM, Pierre. 1906. La théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure. Paris. Chevalier & Rivière Éditeurs.
ESFELD, Michael. 2009. The Modal Nature of Structures in Ontic Structural Realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23(2): 179-194.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903006917
FRENCH, Steven, 2014. The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684847.001.0001
HEIL, John. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0199259747.001.0001
HUMPHREYS, Paul. 2013. Scientific Ontology and Speculative Ontology. In D. Ross, J. Ladyman, H. Kincaid (eds), Scientific Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 51-78
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696499.003.0003
JAMES, William. 1896. The will to Believe. The New World, 5: 327-347.
KUHN, Samuel. 1977. Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice. In The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago: Chicago University Press, p. 320-339.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001
KUSCH, Martin. 2019. Relativist Stances. Virtues and Vices. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93(1): 271-291.
https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akz007
QUINE, Willard. 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, p. 20-46
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c5cx5c.7
LADYMAN, James & ROSS, Don. 2007. Every Thing Must Go. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276196.001.0001
LEWIS, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LEWIS, Peter J. 2018. Inferring Particles. Metascience 27(3) : 357-364
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-018-0340-0
LIPTON, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470855
MAURIN, Anna-Sophia & BRINKS, Ingar. 2005. Revisionary Metaphysics. An interview with David Armstrong. Theoria 71(1): 3-19.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2005.tb01001.x
PAUL, Laurie. 2012. Metaphysics as Modelling: The Handmaiden’s Tale. Philosophical Studies 160(1): 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9906-7
STREVENS, Michael. 2018. Explanation and Reality. Comments on Chakravartty. Metascience, 27(3): 371-378.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-018-0343-x
TELLER, Paul. 2018. Discussion. What is a Stance. Philosophical Studies 121(2): 159-170.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-5489-2
VAN FRAASSEN, Bas C. 2002. The Empirical Stance. Yale: Yale University Press.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Raphaël Künstler 2021
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, l'ouvrage étant alors disponible simultanément, sous la licence Licence d’attribution Creative Commons permettant à d'autres de partager l'ouvrage tout en en reconnaissant la paternité et la publication initiale dans cette revue.