Change in the Decision Sciences


  • Paul Weirich University of Missouri


Mots-clés :

decision, deliberation, idealization, model, rationality


A common type of change in science occurs as theorists generalize a model of a phenomenon by removing some idealizations of the model. This type of change occurs in the decision sciences and also in the normative branch of the decision sciences that treats rational choice. After presenting a general account of model generalization, the paper illustrates generalization of models in normative decision theory. The principal illustration generalizes a standard model of rational choice by removing the idealization that deliberation has no cost.


Broome, John. 1991. Weighing Goods. Oxford: Blackwell.

Colyvan, Mark. 2013. Idealizations in Normative Models. Synthese 190, 1337–50.

Fowler, A. C. 1997. Mathematical Models in the Applied Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbard, Allan., Harper, William. 1981. Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility. In Harper, William., Stalnaker, Robert, Pearce, Glenn. (eds.). Ifs. Dordrecht: Reidel. 153–90.

Joyce, James. 1999. The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krantz, David, Luce, R. Duncan, Suppes, Patrick, Tversky, Amos. 1971. Foundations of Measurement. Volume I. New York: Academic Press.

Mäki, Uskali. 2002. Introduction. In Mäki, Uskali. (ed.). Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism, and Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–34.

Peterson, Martin. 2009. An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sugden, Robert. 2002. Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics. In Mäki, U. (ed.). Fact and Fiction in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 107–136.

Weirich, Paul. 2015. Models of Decision-Making: Simplifying Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




Comment citer

Weirich, Paul. 2018. « Change in the Decision Sciences ». Lato Sensu: Revue De La Société De Philosophie Des Sciences 5 (1):13-19.