Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v8i1.68353Keywords:
Jesus, Incarnation, Nicene Christology, Chalcedonian Christology, homoousios, Timothy PawlAbstract
This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Steven Nemes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.