Arguing for Atonement?
Keywords:Abstract Objects, Aseity, Atonement, Nominalism, Platonism
According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement.
How to Cite
Davis, R. B. (2022). Arguing for Atonement?. TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology, 6(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473
Copyright (c) 2022 Richard Brian Davis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.