Oneness Pentecostalism, the Two-Minds View, and the Problem of Jesus's Prayers

  • Skylar D. McManus Regent University
Keywords: Oneness Pentecostalism, modalism, prayer, Tom Morris, Christology, analytic theology

Abstract

Even thirty years after Thomas Morris wrote The Logic of God Incarnate, there are some claims that Morris makes that require examination in analytic Christology. One of those claims is a concession that Morris gives to modalists near the end of the book, where he says that the two–minds view he has defended can be used to provide a consistent modalistic understanding of Jesus’s prayer life. This view, he says, blocks the inference from the fact that Jesus prays to the Father to the additional claim that Jesus and the Father are numerically distinct. I argue that Oneness Pentecostals can appropriate central concepts from The Logic of God Incarnate as Morris suggests, and further that this means Oneness Pentecostals should abandon the claim that Jesus believes he just is the Father. Once Oneness Pentecostals abandon this claim, they can give a possible explanation of how it is that Jesus relates to the Father in prayer even though he just is the Father.

Published
2019-01-14
How to Cite
McManus, S. (2019). Oneness Pentecostalism, the Two-Minds View, and the Problem of Jesus’s Prayers. TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v2i3.2313