Oneness Pentecostalism, the Two-Minds View, and the Problem of Jesus's Prayers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v2i3.2313Keywords:
Oneness Pentecostalism, modalism, prayer, Tom Morris, Christology, analytic theologyAbstract
Even thirty years after Thomas Morris wrote The Logic of God Incarnate, there are some claims that Morris makes that require examination in analytic Christology. One of those claims is a concession that Morris gives to modalists near the end of the book, where he says that the two–minds view he has defended can be used to provide a consistent modalistic understanding of Jesus’s prayer life. This view, he says, blocks the inference from the fact that Jesus prays to the Father to the additional claim that Jesus and the Father are numerically distinct. I argue that Oneness Pentecostals can appropriate central concepts from The Logic of God Incarnate as Morris suggests, and further that this means Oneness Pentecostals should abandon the claim that Jesus believes he just is the Father. Once Oneness Pentecostals abandon this claim, they can give a possible explanation of how it is that Jesus relates to the Father in prayer even though he just is the Father.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Skylar D. McManus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.