An essay of a systemic reading that can support a paradigm shift

Abstract

The observation of the “observed behaviors in action” is a complex act. Observation without evaluation of a single fact, except being in a solipsistic approach, can be seen as a relatively simple operation that allows a median intersubjective agreement. When the mission is to report of operative's phenomena that should lead, by consensus, to an assessment, we are in the presence of tensions. This evaluation will implement abstractions needed for the operation of the phenomena’s representations. These abstractions make use of concepts whose meaning can only be understood only in relation to its opposite: cold - hot, open - closed, operating – non-operating. Common sense tells us that the assessment is not a matter of choice between one of the words but need a gradation. Based on this observation (many times repeated by others before us), we are led to revisit our systems approach. It appears obvious to us that the approach to the entities’ identification that is connected to form a coherent whole is not sufficient. We must adopt an approach whose foundation may account for the processes, movements and tensions. Our study focused of the field theory. This brings us in the heart of a paradox: continuous-discrete. The same paradox has stimulated research in quantum field using particle and wave relation.